Here is our response to the recent consultation from WODC (closing in early August 2025)
Policy PL5 – Carterton-Witney-Oxford Rail Corridor
Question: Do you support Policy PL5, and how could it be strengthened?
“Witney Oxford Transport strongly supports Policy PL5 but believes it requires strengthening to ensure delivery.”
We support:
- Safeguarding the rail corridor from Carterton to Yarnton
- Recognition of stations at Carterton, Witney, and Eynsham
- Integration with wider transport planning
We request strengthening through:
- Delivery timescales: Include target dates for feasibility studies and construction phases
- Funding mechanisms: Specify how developer contributions will fund rail infrastructure
- Firmer commitments: Move beyond ‘safeguarding’ to active delivery requirements
- Integration requirements: Mandate that significant developments (300+ homes) demonstrate rail compatibility
Protection measures: Stronger policies preventing development that could compromise the route
The A40 corridor faces severe congestion, which is expected to worsen with the planned expansion of housing. Rail is essential for sustainable transport and achieving the Plan’s net-zero objectives.
Core Policy 3 – Spatial Strategy
Question: “Do you support the spatial strategy focusing growth along the A40 corridor?”
WOT Response: Witney Oxford Transport supports concentrating growth along the A40 corridor, but emphasises that this requires rail infrastructure to be sustainable.
The strategy correctly identifies the A40 corridor as a key growth area; however, the current transport infrastructure is already under severe pressure. Without a Carterton-Witney-Oxford rail link:
- 16,000 new homes will generate approximately 32,000 additional car journeys daily
- A40 congestion will become gridlock, undermining the economic benefits of growth
- Net-zero transport objectives cannot be achieved
We recommend:
- Making rail delivery a prerequisite for significant A40 corridor developments
- Requiring transport impact assessments to include rail alternatives
- Phasing development to align with rail infrastructure delivery
The spatial strategy is sound but needs rail to be deliverable and sustainable.
Core Policy 1 – Climate Change
Question: How can the climate change policy be strengthened?
WOT Response: The climate policy must explicitly recognise transport infrastructure as essential for emission reductions.
Current gaps:
- Focus on building emissions, but limited attention to transport infrastructure
- No specific targets for reducing transport modal share
- Insufficient emphasis on public transport delivery
Recommended additions:
- Target: Reduce private car dependency by 25% by 2035 through public transport
- Requirement: Major developments must demonstrate a contribution to sustainable transport infrastructure
- Recognition: Rail infrastructure as a climate change mitigation measure equivalent to renewable energy
The Carterton-Witney-Oxford rail link would:
- Remove at least 2,000 car journeys daily from the A40
- Reduce transport emissions by 15% across the corridor
- Enable modal shift essential for net-zero targets Without rail, WODC Plan’s climate objectives are unachievable.
Core Policy 4 – Delivering New Homes
Question: Do you support the housing delivery strategy?
WOT Response: “The housing numbers are challenging but achievable if supported by appropriate transport infrastructure.
Key concerns:
- 16,000 new homes without rail will create transport chaos
- Focus on housing delivery speed may override infrastructure planning
- Risk of piecemeal development that doesn’t integrate with rail plans
Essential requirements:
- Strategic sites (300+ homes) must contribute to rail infrastructure through S106 agreements
- Phasing policies to ensure transport infrastructure keeps pace with housing
- Integration requirements – all A40 corridor sites must demonstrate rail compatibility
We support the 10% buffer for flexibility but recommend:
- Part of this buffer should be contingent on rail delivery
- Use flexibility to ensure infrastructure-led development
Housing growth is positive but must be transport-sustainable to avoid creating new problems.
Settlement Strategies – Witney
Question: Comments on the Witney settlement strategy?
WOT Response: “The Witney strategy correctly identifies transport as the town’s most significant challenge but needs stronger rail commitments.
We strongly support:
- Recognition of A40 congestion as a major constraint Sustainable transport as a strategic objective
- Bridge Street bottleneck acknowledgment
Critical additions needed:
Rail Delivery Timeline – When Will the Oxford Link Be Restored?
Integration Requirements – How Will New Developments Support Rail?
Traffic reduction targets – specific goals for modal shift
Recommended policy additions:
- All significant Witney developments must include rail contribution requirements
- Transport assessments must model rail alternatives
- New developments should be accessible to future rail stations
Without rail, Witney’s growth strategy will fail due to transport constraints. The strategy needs rail to be deliverable.
Settlement Strategies – Carterton
Question: Comments on the Carterton settlement strategy?
WOT Response: “The Carterton strategy’s transformational growth vision is excellent but absolutely requires rail delivery.
Strong support for:
- Recognition of rail as essential for economic potential A40 access improvements
- Strategic employment growth vision, including the development of RAF Brize Norton
Critical implementation points:
‘Transformational’ growth cannot happen without rail – this must be explicit. The Timeline for rail delivery should align with housing phases
Significant developments should contribute proportionally to the rail infrastructure
Specific recommendations:
- Require rail feasibility contributions from developments over 100 homes
- Include rail accessibility in site selection criteria
- Phase growth to ensure rail delivers before peak housing completions
Carterton has enormous potential, but this potential is entirely dependent on solving transport connectivity. Rail isn’t optional – it’s essential.
Policy DM20 – Town Centres
Question: Comments on town centre policies?
WOT Response: “Town centre vitality depends on accessibility – rail is essential for both Witney and Carterton centres.
Current challenges:
- Parking constraints limit town centre access
- Car dependency undermines sustainability goals
- Competition from Oxford/Bicester requires better connectivity
Rail benefits for town centres:
- Direct access from Oxford brings customers without parking needs
- Reduced traffic improves pedestrian environment
- Economic multiplier – rail stations become economic anchors
Policy recommendations:
- Include rail accessibility as a town centre vitality factor
- Require pedestrian/cycle links from future stations to centres
- Plan station-adjacent development to support town centre economy
Strong town centres need sustainable transport access – rail is the key to long-term vitality.
Policy DM24 – Active and Healthy Travel
Question: Comments on active travel policy?
WOT Response: “Excellent policy that needs rail integration to maximise effectiveness.
Strong support for:
- Active travel prioritization
- Integration with development Network connectivity focus
Essential addition:
- Rail stations should be active travel hubs with:
- Secure cycle parking (minimum 100 spaces per station)
- Walking/cycling routes connecting stations to residential areas
- Integration with bus services and car clubs
Recommended policy addition:
- Significant developments within 2km of planned rail routes must provide direct active travel connections to future stations
- Active travel assessments should include rail station accessibility
Active travel and rail are complementary – together they can achieve the modal shift needed for sustainability.
General Economic Benefits
Question: How can the Plan better support economic development?
WOT Response: “Rail infrastructure is economic infrastructure – essential for West Oxfordshire’s economic future.
Economic benefits of rail:
- £2.4 billion economic impact over 30 years (typical rail project multiplier)
- 4,000+ jobs during construction phase
- Reduced business costs – employees can live locally without car commuting
- Inward investment – businesses locate near good transport links
- Relieve pressure on overstretched Oxford resources
- Tourism boost – sustainable access to Cotswolds attractions
Policy recommendations:
- Include rail in economic development policies
- Require economic impact assessments to include rail benefits Consider rail a strategic economic asset like employment land
- Evidence base: Every £1 invested in rail typically generates £4 in economic benefits. Rail isn’t just transport – it’s economic development infrastructure.
Infrastructure and Viability
Question: Comments on infrastructure delivery and viability?
WOT Response: “Infrastructure delivery policies must prioritise strategic transport alongside utilities.”
Key points:
- Rail infrastructure serves multiple developments, more cost-effective than individual site solutions
- Cumulative contributions from A40 corridor developments can fund rail delivery
- Viability assessments should include long-term transport costs
Recommended mechanism:
- Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) specifically for rail infrastructure
- S106 contributions scaled to development size and transport impact
- Pooled funding approach rather than site-by-site assessment
- Economic argument: Rail infrastructure increases land values and development viability long-term. Initial contributions are investments in sustainable growth, not costs.
Key Consultation Questions WODC needs to address:
How will Policy PL5 be implemented? We request specific mechanisms and timescales.
What developer contributions will fund rail infrastructure?
Ensure coordination with central housing allocations?
What safeguards exist against piecemeal development? We must protect corridor integrity.
Witney Oxford Transport
Email: info@witneyoxfordtransport.org.uk
Website: witneyoxfordtransport.org.uk
